Saturday, November 2, 2013

Arizona Supports Windcrest!!

Did you know a PAC in Arizona made a $2000 donation to Impact Windcrest PAC, the same PAC that promotes Mayor Alan Baxter and Councilman John Gretz?  
   Yes, all of those expensive looking full page glossy mail outs are being supported by an Arizona PAC.

  Consider this link:
http://www.opensecrets.org/pacs/expenditures.php?cycle=2012&cmte=C00428391

It shows an expenditure of $2000 to Impact Windcrest Cmte.PAC

Republic Services Expenditures | OpenSecrets - OpenSecrets.org. 10, Impact Windcrest Cmte Pac, $2,000


REPUBLIC SVCS. INC. EMPLOYEES FOR BETTER GOVT. PAC 



 Question:  Who is Republic Services and why did they donate $2000 to the City of Windcrest, Impact Windcrest PAC?


The answer lies right in plain view.  Go to the Windcrest City Web site.  Click on:  http://www.ci.windcrest.tx.us/index.aspx?NID=246

  This page addresses Curb Side pickup.  Look in the second paragraph and click the underlined word: Allied Services/BFI 

That link takes you directly to their home web site. Republicservices.com  Yep, the same company that has the City Garbage/Trash Contract. Those garbage trucks rolling thru our streets and alleys belong to Allied Services/BFI whose parent is Republic Services.  Is there a connection?    Is this a level playing field for other garbage/trash vendors?  

  As a concerned citizen I recommend voting for:
Mark Perry for Mayor 
Dennis Allen for City Council Place 5

  Their PAC support dollars comes from local citizens.

Thursday, October 24, 2013

Smoke & Mirrors in Windcrest

 Have you noticed how Transparency works in Windcrest?  The City Council meetings are recorded and available for live streaming, however, if you missed the live meeting, actually viewing the official video may require an Open Records request.  The process of posting council meeting videos to the city web page appears to vary depending on the content of the video.

  Posting a video for public viewing is a straight forward process requiring a few minutes at the computer to accomplish.  Some council meeting videos have been posted as early as the following morning so you know it's possible. It appears that if the content of the meeting has anything controversial the video does not get posted for days and days.  Why is that?  Maybe because Mayor Alan E. Baxter and councilman John Gretz are running for re election.   Controlling what is released and when reminds me of other forms of government, not an open and transparent government.  Running for office saying "we are Open and Transparent" while delaying the release of public information, amounts to nothing more than smoke and mirrors.
 
  Windcrest has ordinances such as the number of animals allowed per household, speed limits, signs, and weeds etc.   Windcrest should enact an ordinance dictating council meeting videos be posted to the city web page within 48 hours.  This idea would require Transparency and not allow politicians and administrators to use the current smoke and mirror tactics.

   Sadly, the faster process is to submit an Open Records request for the video.  Even that process is allowed 10 working days, but at least you will receive the video.

Wednesday, October 16, 2013

Windcrest Fire Chief Salary Info


The E-mail exchanges below were between Don , Mayor Baxter and Rackspace concerning the Windcrest Fire Chief  Salary Question/ Situation.  Start reading from the bottom of this email to read the emails in the order received.  I encourage you to Vote for Mark Perry and Dennis Allen!

----- Original Message ----- From: Don ---To Windcrest Citizens
From: Donald
Hey, Ya'll:
Here is Rackspace's General Counsel's official reply to my question about Graham Weston's "alleged" endorsement of Alan Baxter's re-election campaign for Mayor, as was printed in his latest election pamphlet (not a flier)! Ya'll may want to consider some way you can get this information out to our voting public.
Alan keeps asking to meet with me for a "discussion" about Dan Reese and the Fire Chief's salary; and I keep telling him NO, unless he is going to discuss how he is going to make the changes I have requested NLT City Council Meeting, next Monday.
Keep up the good work.
Don
----- Original Message ----- From: Alan xxxxxxxx
To: Donald
Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2013 8:03 AM
Subject: Re: SALARY QUESTION
Dear Mr. Myles,
Thank you for your email. I want to clarify that Graham Weston has not endorsed any candidate in the Windcrest City Council elections, and Rackspace as a policy does not endorse candidates in elections. Further, we have not authorized any publication that implies otherwise. The quote in the mailer you refer to was from a magazine article printed months ago. Although Rackspace as a company does not endorse candidates, we encourage credible candidates to schedule a visit to our campus and give our employees a chance to meet them and freely discuss campaign issues, their platforms and viewpoints.
We at Rackspace appreciate the direction that Windcrest has taken over the past couple of years since the change of leadership at the City, and we look forward to working with the City Council in the future on issues of mutual interest, no matter who is ultimately elected in November.
If you have any further questions, please let me know.
Best,
Alan xxxxxxxxxxxxx
5000 Walzem Road
San Antonio, Texas 78218


----- Original Message ----- From: Don ---To Rackspace
Email:
From: Don <> Date: Monday, October 14, 2013 10:05 PM To:xx rackspace.com> Subject: Fw: SALARY QUESTION

I believe that it is important for me to furnish you copies of these latest emails between Mayor Baxter and myself. Mayor Baxter's latest manipulation and badgering of personnel into leaving our City or retiring early from key leadership positions has resulted in the resignation of our Fire Chief, Dan Reese, effective 1 Nov 2013. My emails reflect my humble efforts to get Mayor Baxter to turn this situation around and retain the Fire Chief. You'll see my reasons and get a better picture of the situation after you read my emails. This latest personnel debacle by Mayor Baxter is just another example of his "lousy" and ineffective personnel policies and management. He is a successful "promoter" but an unsuccessful people person and people leader! If we do not convince the Mayor to correct this situation, I'm afraid what he and his City Council will do, as they have done in the past, is appoint a more junior, less experienced Chief to lead this extremely critical City department. I think ya'll should be concerned about this action, since our Windcrest Fire Department is responsible for the safety and well-being of your personnel and physical plant when medical care and fire prevention and protection are needed.
By the way, Graham, I was quite surprised when your picture and strong, personal endorsement of Mayor Baxter appeared on the front page of his latest 8-page re-election campaign pamphlet mailed to all Windcrest residents. Just in case you haven't seen the pamphlet, he quoted you as follows: "Mayor Alan Baxter has revealed a great vision for the city of Windcrest, and it's been a pleasure to work alongside him as we build a strong civic and corporate relationship . . . Just like Rackspace, the mayor values transparency and openness, and this has served the city well." It was signed, "Graham Weston, Rackspace Founder and Chairman of the Board," with your snapshot next to your name. Did you really make this endorsement; did you give the Mayor permission to print it; and intend to have it mailed to all Windcrest residents?
If I can be so bold to ask, any help and support you can give to the reinstatement of our Fire Chief and to the establishment of a fair and equitable salary level for the Fire Chief position will be greatly appreciated by myself and all our Windcrest residents. (Also, in case you may be wondering, I am supporting Mark Perry and Dennis Allen in the upcoming election!)
Thanks much for your time and consideration.
Don
Former Mayor
City of Windcrest


----- Original Message ----- From: Donald
To: Alan Baxter
Sent: Monday, October 14, 2013 9:22 PM
Subject: Re: SALARY QUESTION
I don't believe there is anything to discuss with you, Alan, unless it is a discussion or explanation of your Plan of Action to (1) retain Dan Reese as Fire Chief, (2) establish a respectable and sensible salary rate for the Fire Chief position, as I have spelled out in my below email to you, and (3) set an agenda to complete these actions at the upcoming City Council Meeting on 21 Oct 2013.
You can complete these actions, Alan, if you make the decision to do it! You have demonstrated many times that once you establish a goal, you will complete it! Our City deserves an experienced Fire Chief who is a proven leader and a man of the highest integrity, and one who is paid a fair and decent salary comparable and equal to the critical responsibilities and duties of that position.
Thank you,
Don
----- Original Message ----- From:Alan Baxter
To: DonSent: Monday, October 14, 2013 8:42 AM
Subject: RE: SALARY QUESTION
I would be happy to sit down and discuss this issue with you.


----- Original Message ----- From: Don 
From: Donald [mailto:xxxxxx] Sent: Sunday, October 13, 2013 8:18 PM
To: Alan Baxter Subject: Re: SALARY QUESTION
Mayor Alan:
No, Alan, your reply does not answer my question. I've thought long and hard, over the past eight days, about your reply and this issue, i.e., Dan Reese and his position as Chief, Windcrest Volunteer Fire Department. I believe we know each other well enough that I can be honest and direct with you on this subject through the following points:
1. Turn this situation around and retain Dan Reese as the Fire Chief! If you would personally commit yourself to this goal like you have to completing a $300,000.00 improvement to a Takas Park pond and winning your current re-election campaign, you can personally advocate for Dan Reese to be our Fire Chief at a respectable salary rate. Your fellow City Council members will get behind you and approve this action. After all, as you said, "we have the money, and we intend to raise the compensation."
2. At the risk of getting your ire up, Alan, make me not believe that the reason you are not advocating for Dan Reese is because his resigning and leaving allows you to finally accomplish your long-term goal of getting rid of (or "cleaning house") all the personnel who were in key leadership positions or in positions of high responsibility during the previous Mayor Jack Leonhardt administration. After all, Chief Dan Reese is the last one left from that time!
3. (Hoping that you have not destroyed this email after reading the above paragraph and are continuing to read it) A salary of $48K ($36K for Fire Chief and $12K for additional duty of Fire Inspector) or $61K--figures that have been mentioned by you and other sources--is not a respectable or sensible salary for our Fire Chief for the following reasons: (a) the average salary for fire chief position in our immediate surrounding cities is approximately $77K; (b) a beginning police officer, without any experience, in our City makes $38K; (c) base salary for the Windcrest Police Chief is approx. $67K, without any additional duties--that's $31K more than the Fire Chief, with additional duties; add in benefits, and the Police Chief's salary is at nearly $88K; and (d) at a Fire Chief salary of $48K, a City Admin. Secretary, Public Works Technician, and City Postal Clerk would have annual salaries nearly as much as the Fire Chief; the Fleet Mechanic would
make more! Fire Chief annual salary rates at $48K or $61K make no sense and reflect poor personnel management policies and practices!
4. As I said in my earlier email, Alan, the responsibilities and duties of the Fire Chief are of the highest critical nature--directing fire department operations; supervising, mentoring, and training young volunteer firefighters and EMS technicians who save lives; and being a firefighter and EMS technician, himself. And, if the City so acts, the Chief would have an additional, critical duty of Fire Inspector. All of these, as well as others I have not listed, are responsibilities and duties just as critical and aschallenging as those of a Police Chief. As such, the salary levels should be very similar, if not the same. These conclusions are not just mine but are also those of "Public Sector" salary surveys and Fire Chief salary levels set by our surrounding cities.
5. To quote you, Alan, "I really like Chief Reese . . .;" "we, as a city, want to do what is right;" and "we are in uncharted waters." You can do what is right, Alan, and be a strong Captain of the ship. Sail the ship (or our City) out of troubled, uncharted waters. Give the Fire Chief, Dan Reese, the respectable and sensible salary that he and the position deserve. You can do it as soon as the next City Council meeting on Monday, 21 October. There and then, take the lead! Put a $70K - $80K salary level for the Fire Chief position on the agenda and on the table. Advocate for its approval; and lead the Council to take a vote to approve! Our Fire Department will continue to be strong, and our City and citizens will be safer.
Thanks much.
Don
 ----- Original Message ----- From:Alan Baxter
To: Donald
Cc:Pamela Dodson ; Rafael Castillo ; Sarah Mangham ; Michael Brenan ( ; Dan S
ent: Saturday, October 05, 2013 10:45 AM
Subject: RE: SALARY QUESTION
Dr. Myles,
Thank you for your email.
The Fire Chief was paid the figure you mentioned as that was the highest salary allowable under the law, as he was not fully qualified when he took over the position. Just recently, he became fully qualified.
When the position went out at the time Chief Reese applied, it was not advertised at a salary level you indicate. Please remember, we are a Volunteer Fire Department. This administration has made it
clear that we do not want to move towards a paid Fire Department. We want to keep it a volunteer department. You might recall, prior administrations pushed for a paid Fire Department, and it was even mentioned in the MEIA that the city signed prior to this administration and prior to the current WEDC’s tenure.
We have been doing research to find an apples to apples scenario on what a VFD Chief gets paid. We have only found one example. Coincidentally, this one example did not pay the Fire Chief what the Police Chief made.
We are trying to do what is right for all involved. During this time, the Chief retained a lawyer. Well, that slows things down. I really like Chief Reese and have worked quite a bit with him over the last two years. We, as a city, want to do what is right. We are in uncharted waters.
The Council has stated on many occasions on the record that we will move the salary needle with regard to this position with a budget adjustment. We have the money and we intend to raise the compensation. We are planning to have a special meeting before the Regular City Council Meeting on October 21 to do just that.
I hope this answers your question.
Feel free to call me to discuss further if you wish.
.
ALAN

----- Original Message ----- From:Don Myles

From: Donald [mailto:xxxxxx] Sent: Saturday, October 05, 2013 12:02 AM To: Alan Baxter Subject: SALARY QUESTION
Mayor Alan:
Could you please explain to me why the Fire Chief salary is set at only $16,000.00 (approx.) per year?
I believe that it is time for you and the Council to pay that position a salary that is equal to the critical responsibilities of the job--directing fire department operations, supervising and training volunteer firefighters who save lives; and fighting fires and saving lives, himself. Carrying out these responsibilities and duties certainly deserves a salary equal to the Police Chief, and greater than an Administrative Secretary, Postal Clerk, or Public Works Technician--all of whom are currently paid more than the Fire Chief!
How do ya'll justify such a low pay scale for such a critical position/job? Thank you.
Don

Thursday, August 1, 2013

Severance Package Deal!

  Found this interesting so cross posting the blog. Mr. Gretz is runing for City Council Place 4 

Council Persons John Gretz, Pam Dodson, Jake Jacobi, and Jim Shelton, voted in favor of approving a severance package for Police Chief Pabon during SCCM on Sept 29th, 2011. (Rita Davis was absent)
  This agreement in the severance package was drafted by the Windcrest City Attorney and I find this extract appalling:
   (Chief Pabon is the Employee)
“… Employee understands that this agreement not to disclose applies to everyone to whom Employee may so disclose, specifically including, but not limited to all citizens of the City, present and former employees of the City, applicants for any position with the City, and any persons or entities with actual or proposed business dealings with the City.”….(emphasis added)
 Now Consider this:
  1. The Motion was approved Sept 29th during the 3pm council meeting.
  2. The Check was signed and Dated Sept 28th!!!  The day before Council Met!!
Is this not proof positive of a back room deal?  Seems the council meeting and vote was for SHOW folks, the decision had already been made.


  What is going on when the City Attorney includes wording in an agreement that even the existence of this agreement can NOT be disclosed to any persons, Specifically Citizens of Windcrest.

  The same City Attorney denied an open records request for a copy of the Severance Agreement. However, the Texas Attorney General issued an opinion the city had to release the Severance Agreement.

The total cost to the City of Windcrest for this Severance Package was $49,360.27. 

Yes!! Check  was cut BEFORE council voted to approve Chief Pabon’s Severance Package!!!
  Do you think signing a check prior to Council approval violated city finance policies and procedures?  

  Should Windcrest Citizen's be concerned?  This is just an example of how the current administration conducts city government.   

Sunday, July 28, 2013

Fire Truck Tours for Windcrest Light Up!

Currently the WEDC does not have a "Racker' on the WEDC Board of Directors.  Originally when Rackspace first arrived the rules were changed to allow for one non Windcrest resident board member.  There was a fire truck with Rackspace vip and family touring Windcrest to view the lights, you could not miss that huge truck and everyone waving.

Tuesday, July 23, 2013

Slick Willy is about

As part of the 2007 "Project Castle", the City of Windcrest Economic Development Corporation (WEDC) purchased the old Windsor Park Mall property and vacant 111 acres down along Eisenhouer Rd. The property was annexed into the City of Windcrest.

A previous WEDC board had the right idea, they established a Declaration of Restrictive Covenants in August 2007 when the property was purchased by WEDC.  This declaration prohibited a list of businesses Windcrest wished to prohibit.  This declaration prohibited businesses such as mobile home parkssexually oriented businesses, used car lots, to mention a few..  

July 18, 2013, the CURRENT WEDC Board, all hand picked by the current Mayor Baxter, approves a motion to Terminate the entire Declaration of Restrictive Covenants!!

Yes folks, the current WEDC board terminated the restrictive covenants so now nothing is prohibited.  Do you think this current hand picked board has any foresight?  You gotta ask yourself, what do they see?  

  It seems a change in current leadership is overdue!

Tuesday, July 16, 2013

Latest News

There is an excellent web site at "WindcrestWins.org" with tons of valuable information.  The City of Windcrest recently accepted a Financial Audit of both the City of Windcrest and Windcrest Economic Development Corporation.
  The WindcrestWins.org site presents many highlights of the actual financial picture and what is actually happening behind the scenes.  The Auditor's report was pretty clean.  It tells me there were invoices for payments, the numbers of income and payments match.  But there is no mention of what the invoices are paying for.
 For example, there is an entry to Houston Community Bank for loan payoff for some $12+ K.  A search of the City of Windcrest web page returns nothing concerning Houston Community Bank.  Whose loan was this?  Why did the City of  Windcrest even have a loan from Houston Community Bank?
 Another example are the vast number of canceled checks.  Checks were written to individuals and companies for several thousand dollars, then more checks to the SAME individuals and companies for the exact same amounts.  Next there are entries to Void the checks.  Ok, so you think, no big deal, I've done that with my own checking account.  Did you do it some 30 times? Keep in mind, these are professional financial people!  So why so many mistakes?

Comments Welcome

Welcome to the WindcrestCitizen Blog site.  Information on our current local government and administration policies.  The administration would have everyone believe the "Spin", meanwhile behind the scene quite the opposite is happening.